Christian group that wants Bible read in schools introduces indecent exhibitions bill

The bill, which has been dubbed the “Sexual Harassment in Public Performance Act,” aims to address concerns about minors being exposed to explicit content in public venues.

The Controversial Bill

The bill, which has been met with both praise and criticism, aims to address concerns about minors being exposed to explicit content in public venues. The Idaho Family Policy Center, a conservative advocacy group, has been a driving force behind the legislation.

Key Provisions

The bill would require hosts and organizers of public performances considered indecent to take “reasonable steps” to safeguard their events from access by minors. The definition of “indecent” would be left to the discretion of the host or organizer, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement. The bill would not provide clear guidelines or penalties for non-compliance, leaving it up to the discretion of law enforcement. ## The Concerns*

The Concerns

Critics argue that the bill would be overly broad and could lead to the censorship of artistic expression. The definition of “indecent” would be subjective and open to interpretation, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement. The bill would not provide adequate protections for minors, as it would only require hosts and organizers to take “reasonable steps” to safeguard their events.

“We want to make sure that minors are protected from exposure to adult content.”

The Proposed Legislation: Protecting Minors from Adult Content

The proposed legislation aims to protect minors from exposure to adult content in various settings, including strip clubs and adult movie stores. The law would hold hosts and organizers of such establishments accountable for damages if minors are exposed to “sexual conduct” while on the premises.

Key Provisions of the Legislation

Minors who access performances that involve “sexual conduct” could sue hosts and organizers for damages. The law would prohibit minors from patronizing strip clubs and adult movie stores. The legislation would also require establishments to implement measures to prevent minors from accessing adult content. ### The Importance of Protecting Minors*

The Importance of Protecting Minors

Protecting minors from exposure to adult content is crucial for their well-being and development. Research has shown that exposure to explicit content can have negative effects on children’s cognitive, emotional, and social development. By holding hosts and organizers accountable for damages, the proposed legislation would help to prevent minors from being exposed to adult content that could harm them.

The Role of Hosts and Organizers

Hosts and organizers of strip clubs and adult movie stores have a responsibility to ensure that minors are not exposed to adult content. This includes implementing measures to prevent minors from accessing adult content, such as age verification processes and monitoring of premises. By taking these steps, hosts and organizers can help to protect minors and prevent them from being exposed to adult content that could harm them.

The Impact on Establishments

The proposed legislation would require establishments to implement measures to prevent minors from accessing adult content.

The Controversy Surrounding the Bill

The bill, which has been met with widespread criticism, aims to restrict the content of live performances in public venues. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established standards for determining what constitutes indecent content, and the bill seeks to apply these standards to live performances as well. The bill’s supporters argue that it is necessary to protect children and families from explicit or suggestive content. Critics, however, argue that the bill is an overreach of government power and infringes on the freedom of expression of performers and audiences.*

The Impact on Performers and Audiences

The bill’s impact on performers and audiences is a major concern for many. The FCC’s standards for determining indecent content are often subjective and can be applied in different ways.

The Silence of the Statesman: A Lack of Response to the Proposed Indecency Bill

The proposed indecency bill has been making headlines in Idaho, with many organizations and individuals weighing in on the issue. However, one organization, the Statesman newspaper, has been noticeably absent from the conversation.

A Missed Opportunity for Dialogue

The lack of response from the Statesman newspaper has left many wondering if the organization is truly committed to addressing the concerns of the LGBTQ+ community. The proposed bill, which aims to restrict certain types of content, has sparked heated debates and discussions across the state. Key points to consider: + The proposed bill restricts certain types of content, including LGBTQ+ themes + The bill has sparked heated debates and discussions across the state + The Statesman newspaper has not responded to an email inquiry about the bill

Reaching Out to Boise Pride

In an effort to get a response from the Statesman newspaper, the organization reached out to Boise Pride via email.